Training for hypertrophy

Science

chris-beardsley
  • 1.Q: How can we assess which training programs will lead to the largest increases in muscle size?
  • 2. A: Long-term studies assessing training variables of the programs
  • 3. Training variables include: - Relative load (percentage of 1RM) - Volume - Proximity to muscular failure - Frequency - Rest period duration - Range-of-motion - Repetition speed - Muscle action (eccentric or concentric)
  • 4. Relative load – the studies
  • 5. Relative load – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret but heavy probably superior
  • 6. Volume – the studies
  • 7. Volume – the conclusions Trained and untrained subjects: More volume = more hypertrophy
  • 8. Muscular failure – the studies
  • 9. Muscular failure – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Limited evidence but closer to failure seems superior
  • 10. Frequency – the studies
  • 11. Frequency – the conclusions Trained subjects: Conflicting evidence but higher might be better Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret
  • 12. Rest periods – the studies
  • 13. Rest periods – the conclusions Trained subjects: Limited evidence but longer might be better Reducing rest periods might be useful Untrained subjects: No evidence
  • 14. Range-of-motion – the studies
  • 15. Range-of-motion – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Larger range-of-motion seems superior
  • 16. Repetition speed – the studies
  • 17. Repetition speed – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret
  • 18. Muscle action – the studies
  • 19. Muscle action – the studies
  • 20. Muscle action – the conclusions Trained subjects: Isokinetic training, eccentric superior Isoinertial training: no evidence Untrained subjects: Isokinetic training, eccentric superior Isoinertial training, concentric might be better
  • 21. Summary Variable Untrained Trained Relative load Difficult to interpret – higher probably superior No evidence Volume More volume = greater hypertrophy More volume = greater hypertrophy Muscular failure Closer to failure = greater hypertrophy No evidence Frequency Difficult to interpret Difficult to interpret – higher might be better Rest period duration No evidence Limited evidence but longer might be better Reducing rest periods might be useful Range-of- motion Larger range-of-motion = greater hypertrophy No evidence Repetition speed Difficult to interpret No evidence Muscle action Isokinetic: eccentric superior Isoinertial: concentric superior Isokinetic: eccentric superior
  • 22. For hypertrophy: use greater volume, large ranges-of-motion, and train closer to failure
  • 23. Free e-book here!
    Please download to view
  • 24
    All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
    Description
    How to alter resistance-training variables to maximize muscular hypertrophy, including relative load, volume, frequency, rest periods, range-of-motion, and muscle action.
    Text
    • 1.Q: How can we assess which training programs will lead to the largest increases in muscle size?
  • 2. A: Long-term studies assessing training variables of the programs
  • 3. Training variables include: - Relative load (percentage of 1RM) - Volume - Proximity to muscular failure - Frequency - Rest period duration - Range-of-motion - Repetition speed - Muscle action (eccentric or concentric)
  • 4. Relative load – the studies
  • 5. Relative load – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret but heavy probably superior
  • 6. Volume – the studies
  • 7. Volume – the conclusions Trained and untrained subjects: More volume = more hypertrophy
  • 8. Muscular failure – the studies
  • 9. Muscular failure – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Limited evidence but closer to failure seems superior
  • 10. Frequency – the studies
  • 11. Frequency – the conclusions Trained subjects: Conflicting evidence but higher might be better Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret
  • 12. Rest periods – the studies
  • 13. Rest periods – the conclusions Trained subjects: Limited evidence but longer might be better Reducing rest periods might be useful Untrained subjects: No evidence
  • 14. Range-of-motion – the studies
  • 15. Range-of-motion – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Larger range-of-motion seems superior
  • 16. Repetition speed – the studies
  • 17. Repetition speed – the conclusions Trained subjects: No evidence available Untrained subjects: Difficult to interpret
  • 18. Muscle action – the studies
  • 19. Muscle action – the studies
  • 20. Muscle action – the conclusions Trained subjects: Isokinetic training, eccentric superior Isoinertial training: no evidence Untrained subjects: Isokinetic training, eccentric superior Isoinertial training, concentric might be better
  • 21. Summary Variable Untrained Trained Relative load Difficult to interpret – higher probably superior No evidence Volume More volume = greater hypertrophy More volume = greater hypertrophy Muscular failure Closer to failure = greater hypertrophy No evidence Frequency Difficult to interpret Difficult to interpret – higher might be better Rest period duration No evidence Limited evidence but longer might be better Reducing rest periods might be useful Range-of- motion Larger range-of-motion = greater hypertrophy No evidence Repetition speed Difficult to interpret No evidence Muscle action Isokinetic: eccentric superior Isoinertial: concentric superior Isokinetic: eccentric superior
  • 22. For hypertrophy: use greater volume, large ranges-of-motion, and train closer to failure
  • 23. Free e-book here!
  • Comments
    Top